8 replies to this topic

[$David]

Kinda getting out of hand IMO. Too many people trying to do services for GP, this doesn't always end up helping both parties. RuneScapk was a prime example. And selling accs is stupid af. People recover accs all the time.

Think it should be outlawed on forums/ts. What do you all think?

[@Anton]

This is a hard question. I think people who are really trusted should be able to do it, But then again there will always be people who are considered trusted that ends up doing something retarded, Like disloyal.

[$Sam]

Was never allowed bro.

[Persian Tom]

We can allow it but will make it known that its up to the buyers discretion to accept the risk and we have nothing to do with it as ranks if they were to be hacked or scammed. All we could do is ban the person if they were hacked, ploot being a prime example but a .5 percentile low iq rank with acp access keeps giving him elder after I ban him.

[@SZN]

I think in term of services a sub forum like "Illegal Marketplace" wouldn't be too bad along as we make a pinned topic with some sort of guidelines that come from that & like if you were to sell on here you have to sign something stating maybe something personal about yourself in case you screw over a CP member

[$Deziqn]

I hate when people post topics about selling accounts because it's so sketchy and accounts nowadays can be recovered in .5 (ive done the same but I recovered an acc from some op kid while we were in a rivalry with them lol)

Usually I would lock/delete them but some I just let them slide (e.g: jv or ezena)

With the recent shenanigans of disloyal, we should just ban acc selling for now, and only let real trusted dudes (pretty much anybody that's been in the clan for a long time and/or somebody who is vouched by others) do services

[$Lila]

Thing is some people I genuinely trust e.g. Ricke and Sep but then you can't just make exceptions based on favouritism

[@Moe]

Lila, on 21 May 2017 - 04:11 AM, said:

Thing is some people I genuinely trust e.g. Ricke and Sep but then you can't just make exceptions based on favouritism

[$Fatal]

It's really a double edged sword.

You could end the problems at the source by prohibiting such services but may upset those who do them/look for them or put the risk onto the members who value the abundance of such services.

Either way I wouldn't mind, but there will always be a slight risk by allowing it.